Customer complaint 8D
Containment is due tomorrow, and the evidence is in five systems.
- Kinds of AI
- SLMsAgentic AI
- Who decides
- Quality engineer
- Where it runs
- Your servers or your cloud account
Agent · containment
- D3Suspect stock counted in the warehouse and in transitERP stock query
- D3Sort at the customer proposed; needs quality engineer approval
SLM · root cause and action
- D4Candidate 1: worn deburring tool, life above limittool counter
- D4Candidate 2: new operator on line 2, weak evidenceshift log
- D7Add a tool-life interlock; update the PFMEA occurrence. The quality engineer decides.
Agent · 8D check
- metD4 candidate 1 is a cause, not a symptom
- metD7 updates the FMEA
- SLM
- Agent
DecidesQuality engineer
1. The desk
Today
- ReadA complaint from the vehicle maker (OEM) arrives with photos and asks for an eight-disciplines (8D) report; containment (D3) is due in 24 hours, root cause in 10 days.
- GatherThe quality engineer spends most of that time collecting genealogy from the manufacturing execution system (MES), past 8D reports, and the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA).
- WriteRoot causes are sometimes symptoms, and the FMEA is not updated.
- SignThe quality engineer signs each 8D step against the customer's deadline.
With the system
- ReadThe SLM reads the complaint, drawings, and past 8Ds, and writes the D2 problem statement (is / is not).SLM
- GatherThe agent pulls batch genealogy from the MES, inspection results, and similar past 8Ds, counts suspect stock in the warehouse and in transit, and drafts D1–D4.Agentic AI
- WriteThe SLM lists candidate root causes with the evidence for each and checks the draft: is D4 a cause, not a symptom? Does D7 update the FMEA?SLM
- SignThe quality engineer reviews the evidence, signs every 8D step, and decides, as before; a person submits to the customer.Person decides
What lands on the desk
The quality engineer starts from a draft where every line points to its evidence: the problem bounded, suspect stock counted, and candidate causes ranked by how well they are supported. The sort and the corrective action are proposals until the engineer signs.
SLM · problem statement
- D2Burr on lots 7740–7742 only; not on line 1photos, MES genealogy
Agent · containment
- D3Suspect stock counted in the warehouse and in transitERP stock query
- D3Sort at the customer proposed; needs quality engineer approval
SLM · root cause and action
- D4Candidate 1: worn deburring tool, life above limittool counter
- D4Candidate 2: new operator on line 2, weak evidenceshift log
- D7Add a tool-life interlock; update the PFMEA occurrence. The quality engineer decides.
Agent · 8D check
- metD4 candidate 1 is a cause, not a symptom
- metD7 updates the FMEA
- SLM
- Agent
DecidesQuality engineer
2. The system
For your technical team — skip it if you like.
How it works
In
- The complaint: portal, email, photos
- Drawings and past 8D reports
- The process FMEA (PFMEA)
- The control plan
SLM · understands
8D reader and writer
Post-trained on the company's 8D reports and OEM formats
Reads
- Everything under In
Out
- D2 problem statement (is / is not)
- Candidate root causes, each with evidence
- 8D check: D4 a cause? D7 updates the FMEA?
Agent · prepares
Evidence-gathering agent
Fixed workflow
Reads
- The problem statement
Out
- Batch genealogy from the MES
- Inspection results, similar past 8Ds
- Suspect stock: warehouse and in transit
- D1–D4 drafted
Decision
Quality engineer
Reads
- The D1–D4 draft with its evidence
Out
- Signs every 8D step
- Customer submission is done by a person
How the agent's work is arrangedFixed workflow
Fixed workflow
The 8D steps and their data sources are the same for every complaint, so a fixed sequence with one reading step is enough.
How the models are trained and tested
Your expert writes the test first. A step the test does not need is skipped, and we say why.
Show the training steps
Small language model (SLM)
Test set
30–60 past 8Ds graded by senior quality engineers (D2 accuracy, cause quality, evidence links).
Dataset
Past 8Ds, PFMEA, control plans, and OEM formats (the German VDA and North American AIAG automotive quality terms).
Continued pre-training (CPT)If needed
Only if the base model fails the test on the plant's technical vocabulary.
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT)
On 8D sections and the 8D quality rules.
Reinforcement learning (RL)Skipped
Skipped: there is no reviewable reward beyond the engineer's grading.
Where the agentic system stops
The quality engineer signs every 8D; customer-facing submission is always a person's.
Show its tools, limits, and record
- Tools and access
- Read the MES, inspection, ERP stock, the 8D archive, and the PFMEA; write drafts in the quality system.
- May not
- Submit to the customer portal, or quarantine stock without approval.
- Who decides and the written limit
- Quality engineerThe quality engineer signs every 8D; customer-facing submission is always a person's.
- Stops when
- Genealogy is incomplete or a stock query fails: the file goes to the engineer, with what is missing.
- Record
- Every query, evidence item, and the engineer's edits.
3. Value and conditions
Where the time goes, and what your institution will measure.
Where the value comes from
- Faster containment.
- Fewer repeat complaints.
- Engineer hours freed from collecting evidence.
What your institution measures
- Time to D3
- Time to D8
- 8D rejection rate by the customer
- Repeat-complaint rate
- Customer parts per million (ppm)
Measured in the Decision Blueprint
Baseline times come from your recent 8Ds; the plant sets the target.
Conditions
The rules, the data, and the known error, with its guard.
- Customer data and drawings under NDA stay on premises; OEM portal terms apply.
- Plausible but wrong root causes: the evidence column is mandatory.
- Every 8D is a draft for the engineer; nothing is submitted automatically.
Start here
We read your recent 8Ds with your quality engineers, map where each piece of evidence lives, and measure today's time to containment before anything is built.
Similar desks
- ModelsSLMsAgentic AI
TodayInspectors check every part under a lamp; night shift misses more, and each nonconformance report takes half a day.
With the systemA draft nonconformance report with its evidence, ready for a hold-or-release call.
Quality engineer decides
- ModelsSLMsAgentic AI
Maintenance on the bottleneck line
TodayThe press fails on the night shift; its vibration had changed weeks before.
With the systemRising stop risk flagged, with a draft work order and a proposed slot.
Maintenance planner decides
Equalize the gap.
Bring one decision. Leave knowing the first step.
A short description of the decision is enough; no confidential records.
https://eqlx.ai/use-cases/complaint-8d · Printed copy; the website is the current version.